Service Untitled


August 31, 2007

It’s Company Policy

Every time a customer service representative has to utter the words “it’s company policy” sirens and bells should go off in the CEO’s office. The reason - most company policies are dumb. They may not be dumb when it comes to saving money or treating customers like they are out to get you, but they are dumb when it comes to building a positive relationship with customers.

I am a big fan of general company policies. Policies that let people break rules instead of having to follow hundreds of little rules and enforce even more dumb policies. It is pretty much impossible to have a policy that will work in all situations. There will always be a gray area and chances are, there will always be a customer or employee that the policy inconveniences or annoys.

Nordstrom has “use your best judgment.” The Geek Squad has “protect our reputation.” Policies like that give representatives the ability to make a call based on the current situation. They can be added on top of regular company policies - as in you can have your normal rules, but you can also give people the freedom to break them if necessary.

I’m not sure about at Nordstrom, but at the Geek Squad, if you break a rule, that is fine, but you do have to tell the company. That way, they knew which rule you broke and why. If the company notices a lot of people are breaking the same rule, then chances are it is a problem with the rule and not the people.

That policy shows open mindedness and general trust. Both are important to keep in mind when you create policies and procedures. If you don’t think your employees are capable of making a good decision, then don’t hire them. If you have policies that outline every single thing your employees should do (including when they are allowed to breath), you’re undermining them. Employees don’t like ot feel like robots.

When you have a whole host of stupid policies, you are also undermining your customers. Customers get sick of being treated like criminals and/or idiots. You want to trust your customers as well. Chances are, they don’t want to rip you off and your policy could be stopping them from having a pleasant experience.

Seth Godin has a great post on giving (and receiving) the benefit of the doubt. Also, check out my post saying to work for the 99%, not the 1%.

August 30, 2007

The Key to Success in Retail

Filed under: Little Things, Big Differences, Customer Satisfaction — Service Untitled @ 6:15 am

A friend of mine recently got a job working in retail. She is a member of the sales team for a mid-range department store and has very little retail experience. So who did she come to asking for help? Me - the person with no retail experience. Did I give some advice? You bet!

My advice to her was to focus on building relationships with customers. If you build a relationship with a customer and that customer becomes a regular, you’re going to do well. I think is the first step to success in retail.

Here is why I think it is worth focusing on building relationships with customers:

Repeat business.
Perhaps one of the best things about building a relationship with customers is that they will come back. If you work selling shoes and build a relationship with a particular customer, they will come to you first when they need shoes.

More referrals.
If you do a great job and the customer likes you, they will tell others about you. Soon, that one customer’s friends will be coming to you to buy shoes. And it goes from there.

More fun.
It probably varies from person to person, but I enjoy working with regulars a lot more than new customers. The work isn’t necessarily easier, but it is more enjoyable. You have a better relationship with the customer and it is easier to provide great service and ensure a great experience.

Helpful boost.
A lot of retail is very seasonal. It is the regular customers that help keep the ship afloat during the slow times.

So, try to build a relationship with your customers. Turn them into regulars by treating them well and it’ll pay off in a lot of ways. Just one of the four reasons should be plenty, but all four is that much better.

August 29, 2007

5 Ways to Reduce Average Call Time

Reducing average call time, call handle time, etc. is something that all customer service managers want to do. Even the ones who really want the best customer service experience don’t mind reducing average call handle time. Customers don’t mind being on the phone less time, either.

With that in mind, here are six ways to reduce average call time.

Encourage self-service.
Encourage the use of self-service tools. If the tools are useful and easy to use, more and more customers will use them. The reason for customers not using self-service tools is not because they are out to get you - it is because the tools are useless, hard to find, and/or hard to use. From my experience, customers like tools that are interactive, FAQs, tutorials with pictures, and searchable knowledge bases. Keep in mind that there is a fine line between encouraging and forcing self-service, though.

Build tools to answer common questions.
If possible, build tools that help answer common questions that you would normally have to ask to find out about an issue. For example, have me to go a page that diagnoses my computer automatically of asking me a whole bunch of questions that does the same thing. It makes the experience easier for everyone.

Pre-verify.
A lot of support calls require verification of a customer’s identity. Or at the very least, gathering of the customer’s personal information. There are always ways to include some sort of verification or reduce call time through your IVR. Invest in a system that can look up a customer’s phone number and ask for the last four digits of their credit card number. Most importantly, once the customer has verified their information using the IVR, don’t ask them to repeat it.

Get to the root of the issue.
Train your representatives to get to the root of the issue. Doing so usually involves learning how to ask the right questions and finding out what happened, what the customer expected to happen, and what the customer wants to happen (or a variation of that). If they know how to find out what the problem is, representatives will be able to resolve it much sooner.

Have fast systems.
I am sure the IT managers, software engineers, etc. looking at this are groaning right now. As an executive, it is worth investing in fast systems. If the systems ran faster, there wouldn’t be as much waiting. Use technologies that can make your systems fly and there will be less waiting.

What strategies do you use for reducing average call time?

August 28, 2007

The Great Call Center Myth

Filed under: Customer Service Experience, Etiquette, Angry Customers, Employees — Service Untitled @ 5:57 am

I’m late for mentioning it, but I came across a great post from Tom at QAQNA about the biggest call center myth. The myth is (paraphrased): in order to provide great customer service, customer service representatives have to be on the phone longer, resulting in increased call time.

I generally don’t even advocate paying that much attention to average call times (or call handle times in some call centers). To me, the most important numbers are customer satisfaction numbers (with the overall experience and the particular representative). If those numbers are good, don’t worry so much about call handle time. However, a lot of call centers do keep call handle time in mind and with good reason.

From what I understand about Tom’s post and my own experience is that the agent’s that are providing the best customer service through the use of soft skills (apologizing, being friendly, etc.) are usually the most talented. Since they are the most talented, they are also very good at doing the hard skills (fixing the problem, etc.). The two often go hand in hand (though not always). The best customer service representatives are usually the best in several areas.

Now for the part where I provide original thoughts.

I’m not sure about you, but in every case I can recall, the good experiences take a lot less time than the bad ones. If I call up a company, get connected quickly, the person helps me, answers my question, I can understand them, gets the problem fixed, etc., then the call gets done very quickly. 5 - 10 minutes, if that. Of course, some issues will take longer than others, but apologizing or being friendly won’t make a meaningful difference for that.

When I have a problem and the customer service provided is not so good, the experience seems to take a lot longer. You find yourself arguing with the representative, repeating information, etc. All of this makes for a much longer and much more frustrating call. It may take a half hour at best and multiple hours at worse.

And aren’t there better ways to cut call handle time? Eliminate stupid verification steps, train your representatives to get to the root of the problem, etc. More about that tomorrow.

I am glad to have assisted Tom in debunking the great call center myth. Now, when will it be on Mythbusters?

August 27, 2007

Palm Gets It!

Filed under: Little Things, Big Differences, Customer Satisfaction, Specific Companies — Service Untitled @ 5:15 am

My friends at Demand Satisfaction! pointed out a cool story that I read about earlier on Friday. Very, very quickly it goes like this:

  1. Super popular blog Engadget posts some useful suggestions for Palm in an open letter. Like most letters of the type, some of the suggestions are very extreme and nearly impossible for a publicly traded company like Palm to do quickly. Others, though, are rather practical and very good things to listen to.
  2. Palm’s CEO, Ed Colligan, responds with a nice note.
  3. Palm gets lots of positive publicity.

Whoever suggested that Ed write that post (or ask Ed if they could write it) should get a bonus. That person should become the company’s media or PR director and get a big medal saying “I Get It.”

Palm’s gesture was not large (only 147 words - about the length of this post to this point) and not specific (nothing promised). However, it seems honest, to the point, and friendly. He thanked Engadget, he said he agreed with every, but not all points, and said the company was on track to make a lot of positive changes.

Palm’s response shows they “get” blogging. It is amazing to see the number of companies that seem to completely ignore the blogosphere. Engadget has a lot of readers and is a serious player. They are a big influencer with a lot of people. Basically, they are worth paying attention to. A lot of blogs are and companies should make an effort to find and monitor those blogs in their space.

I’m not a PR person, but I can appreciate this type of response. It is very similar in customer service:

  1. Respond quickly. (It took Palm about two days to get the post up after Engadget posted it - not that bad.)
  2. Respond sincerely.
  3. Be friendly and courteous.

Those are all good rules of thumb to keep in mind when interacting with others and dealing with any sort of situation (an open letter, a complaint, praise, etc.). Respond quickly and sincerely, and be friendly/courteous with your response. If you do that, people will probably be happy to read what you have to say.

By the way, I’ve owned several Palm PDAs and smartphones over the years and like them a lot! Palm is a good company.

August 24, 2007

Interview with Bruce Eicher - Part Three

Filed under: Customer Service Experience, Behind the Scenes, Specific Companies, Interviews — Service Untitled @ 5:58 am

This is third and final part of the interview with Bruce Eicher, Vice President of Guide Care at ChaCha.

In this part of the interview, Bruce tells me about some software the company uses to monitor chats, details about their internal process group, how they deal with feedback, what tools they give guides, what changes to expect, and more.

(more…)

August 23, 2007

Interview with Bruce Eicher - Part Two

This is part two of the interview with Bruce Eicher, Vice President of Guide Care at ChaCha.

In this part of the interview, Bruce tells me about how ChaCha deals with its biggest challenges, what ChaCha guides do well at, what they have the most trouble with, the site’s registration process, and how they ensure quality.

(more…)

August 21, 2007

Interview with Bruce Eicher from ChaCha

Bruce Eicher is the Vice President of Guide Care at the “human-powered” search engine ChaCha.

ChaCha is an interesting company that I have written about before (here is my guide for their guides and my post summarizing a positive experience). Their customer service challenges are unique - they are dealing with thousands of part-time guides and trying to deliver a positive search experience to thousands of searchers. ChaCha has only been around about a year now (the site was launched in alpha in September), so they are still learning.

This will be a three (possibly four) part interview. Part one is below (”after the jump”). In part one, Bruce tells me about ChaCha, how many active guides they currently have, what their training process is like, what the average guide is like, and the biggest training challenge.

(more…)

Public Shame and Praise to Drive Results

Filed under: Customer Service, Culture, Little Things, Big Differences, Behind the Scenes, Employees — Service Untitled @ 10:37 am

Brent Oxley is the CEO of HostGator, a web host that has been doing very well for a few years now. I know and have worked with Brent before and he has recently been experimenting with the public shame / praise model that I know works so well. It has been a longtime customer service technique and is more often than not, rather effective. In Brent’s case, it seems like it has been effective.

The public shame and praise he chose to do was posting everyone’s customer satisfaction scores on the company bulletin board in the staff lounge. The employees with the best scores were listed at the top and the employees with the worst scores were at the bottom of the list. Everyone sees this sheet every day and it couldn’t be in any plainer view.

Brent told me “I know I would be as embarrassed as hell if my name was on the bottom of the list.” He nailed it. This system is more psychological than anything else. There are no actual consequences from having your name on the bottom of the list (some companies cut the people on the bottom of the list every month), but it is really embarrassing. The fear of embarrassment is probably enough to motivate people to try.

I’m obviously pessimistic (not a common trait in customer service, I know). From the “glass half full” perspective, employees will want to show that they can do well. If they are on the top of the list, it’s an achievement. They peers will see employee’s name on the top of the list and will hopefully be envious. I am conceited enough where I would try to be on the top of the list for just that reason (I try to do my best at anything I do, though).

Regardless of someone’s motivations for getting to the top of the list, it makes a difference. The system is time tested and effective. It has worked so far for Brent and HostGator. It works for a lot of other companies as well.

Here are some tips to drive even more results from your public praise and shame system:

  • Reward employees at the top of the list. Give them bonuses, even more recognition, etc.
  • Fire employees who are consistently on the bottom of the list.
  • Each employee that is at the bottom of the list should have to get coaching or help from a supervisor.
  • Consider posting a list for each day’s scores. And then, another list for the month’s scores.
  • Track other metrics that your company values.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. The system has a lot of potential and has worked well for many years and throughout many companies. I am an advocate of it and would suggest you start doing it if you don’t already.

What would you do to make this system better? What sort of results have seen with this system?

August 20, 2007

Little Things That Add Humor

Filed under: Customer Service Experience, Culture, Little Things, Big Differences — Service Untitled @ 8:09 am

On Friday, I talked about Noah Kagan’s suggestions for a company’s customer service department. A common theme among his suggestions involved humor.

His humor related suggestions were:

- Play jokes instead of mundane hold music.
- Make the “Your call may be recorded” message humorous (We are going to record your call and if you have a great voice we will listen to it every night to put us to sleep.)

I’ve heard about little things like that throughout companies. I read about a company that was sick of endless phone systems. So, they added something like push 5 to hear the lion roar, push 6 to hear the noise in the lunch room, etc. to their phone system. Again, a pretty small thing with the sole purpose of making fun of existing standards.

I’ve already posted my thoughts about how I feel that humor is sometimes uncalled for. In some experiences and situations, it can be pulled off (like the ones listed above, most likely). In others, it can’t. I don’t appreciate it during an in-person customer service interaction and there is a very fine line between funny and obnoxious.

I promise that I am not a cynical, humor hating person. I like jokes and I like comedy. I have favorite comedians and make fun of people and situations. However, I am not sure about humor in customer service situations. Here are my thoughts about whether or not it can be pulled off.

  • Depends on the company’s culture. Some companies have a very laid back, easy going culture. If your company’s culture reflects this, you have a better shot at getting away with humor.
  • Depends on the customer. You may have the most laid back team on the planet and be a very easy going company that loves humor, but if your customers don’t fit that profile as well, avoid humor.

If both our company and your customers have values that align with humor, it’ll probably work out. Make fun of yourselves, your industry, common practices within your industry, etc. as as much as you’d like.

Examples:

  • Microsoft. Microsoft’s enterprise software clients would likely not appreciate humor scattered throughout their contracts or multi-million dollar invoices. Microsoft is not a company people expect humor from.
  • FeedBurner. FeedBurner deals with bloggers. They make fun of themselves and seem to have a very laid back culture. FeedBurner has been very laid back since the beginning (as far as I know). Much more of a fit for humor.
  • Random Client. A client I am working with has a service that is targeted at a very professional group of people. I advised them to stay away from humor and keep things pretty professional. The company’s culture is laid back and fun loving enough, but their customers are not.

I never discourage companies having fun internally. They can make fun of each other as much as they’d like, play games, etc. I think that is great for team building and makes going to work fun. Microsoft probably does this. Google, which has a relatively conservative and professional exterior, does. However, I am not sure about humor to customers and during customer service.

Many companies have humor scattered throughout their product. They have little jokes in their copy, funny error messages, etc. Again, depending on the company and the average customer, these can be pulled off.

What are your thoughts about little doses of humor throughout customer service?