Customer feedback gets personal
There aren’t too many receipts we get from retailers nowadays that don’t offer us some kind of reward to log on to a short customer service survey about our customer experience. Yesterday I purchased dog food from Petco; hence a receipt offering me $2.00 off my next purchase in exchange for answering questions, and then onto Office Depot with another receipt offering a discount to log in and answer some questions. Of course, companies use these customer feedback surveys to gain more insight into their brands, but I often wonder how does a company know how I really feel about my shopping experience without asking me to actually describe it? Answering a question about my in store experience buying copier toner by rating the display on a “one to ten” scale doesn’t necessarily reflect my experience that on this particular visit the display was moved to another part of the store, set up differently, and it took me twice the amount of time to find the toner colors I needed.
Competition is so fierce that standard brand and customer experience feedback questions with repetitive numbers are being replaced by open-ended questions where customers can actually articulate their own views and feelings about products and services. Kampyle, a provider of feedback analytics claim they can figure out why a customer has abandoned their shopping cart. Based on statistics, 29% of users will leave their phone numbers when submitting feedback, and 60% will give their real email addresses. When the company allows customers to steer conversations based on their needs, wants, opinions, and questions, feedback gets more personal.
So how do structured data analysis feedbacks work? For sure they are less precise, but companies agree they are “good enough.” Software spots negative and positive comments specific to the organization. For Choice Hotels and Gaylord Hotels, data will reflect service, rooms, and employee behaviors; tracking trends both good and bad. Keywords such as “wouldn’t return” or “wouldn’t recommend” are recognized, and what used to take weeks and weeks to interpret when done by hand can now be applied immediately.
The software is not without its problems however. Huge companies like BP with diverse operations with clients using 50 different languages would have a difficult time analyzing content. Can any of these automated coding programs capture feedback in different languages or with broad and diverse medical, financial, or legal feedback? Can this technology even understand some of the subtle nuances that could make a difference to clients and customers in selective companies?
So we revert back to social media where we can verbalize our feelings and comments and make a major difference in branding and customer service. Just last week GAP launched an online campaign to introduce their new logo, but when 1000 angry customers posted negative comments on GAP’s Facebook, Marka Hansen, president of GAP in North America announced she and her staff had “been listening to and watching all of the comments this past week” and returned to their original ‘blue box’ logo. So whether GAP did this entire online campaign just to get people talking, it worked and provided us with another lesson in the power of social networking and its effect on customer feedback.
London’s Cooperative Bank states each of us “suffer 246 incidences of bad customer service” during our lifetime. This includes lousy service and less than helpful customer service agents. Cooperative Bank’s poll has named the five worst types of companies for customer service. Can we as consumers always fight back?
Empathica, a customer service management firm, surveyed 3,000 U.S. and Canadian consumers about the value of good service over the quality of food they are given at restaurants. Only one in five people valued good service over the quality of food. A 55% majority of Americans think restaurant service is getting worse, while 32% think service is improving. Another 25% would tell their friends and co-workers not to go to a particular restaurant if they received poor service.
JD Powers & Associates released the results of its annual national pharmacy study emphasizing customers’ cost issues. Of the 12,300 customers polled who had filled prescriptions during a three-month period prior to the survey, satisfaction was rated in chain stores, mass merchandising companies, supermarkets, and mail-order pharmacies. Ultimately the survey showed more savings in mail-order prescriptions, but customer service outweighed saving money.
Surveys are most efficient when they can be performed face to face with a customer because one question seems to always lead to another question. What the respondent perceives about an organization or even the level of service can not always be interpreted in answers ranging from excellent, good, fair, or poor. Most of our impressions when we walk into a store are non-verbal. Haven’t most of us had great first impressions from the moment we opened the door? Was it the pleasant smell of the store, the welcoming, smiling appearance of the salesperson, or the overall appearance of other customers engaged in pleasant conversations just heralding the ambiance of a wonderful experience yet to come?
This is part two of a four part interview with Doria Camaraza, the Senior Vice President and General Manager of Fort Lauderdale Service Center for American Express.
US Airways ranked first on reliability after three consecutive months during April, May, and June; showing statistics of 83 percent of flights arriving within 14 minutes of their scheduled time in June. They also ranked first in customer service for May and June with complaints listed at 1.87 per 100,000 passengers. All 31,000 employees will be rewarded with a $100 bonus each, which represents a $3.1 million payout.
In the recession days of the 1980′s, customers were more concerned about price reductions and convenience rather than the quality of customer service. Now 91% of customers polled in general surveys think that customer service and the quality of that service is important.