Handling Customer Service Issues – Part 2 of 2

Ah, the generic PR-issued corporate statements. Some of them are rather interesting and most of them make almost no sense. If they do make sense, they usually aren’t related to what happened. Here are three examples from Microsoft about a patent issue with Novell:

“Microsoft and Novell have agreed to disagree on whether certain open source offerings infringe Microsoft patents and whether certain Microsoft offerings infringe Novell patents. The agreement between our two companies puts in place a workable solution for customers for these issues, without requiring an agreement between our two companies on infringement.

“Both of our companies are fully committed to moving forward with all of the important work under these agreements. The agreements will advance interoperability between Windows and Linux and put in place a new intellectual property bridge between proprietary and open source software. Customers and participants throughout our industry will clearly benefit from these results.

“We at Microsoft respect Novell’s point of view on the patent issue, even while we respectfully take a different view. Novell is absolutely right in stating that it did not admit or acknowledge any patent problems as part of entering into the patent collaboration agreement. At Microsoft we undertook our own analysis of our patent portfolio and concluded that it was necessary and important to create a patent covenant for customers of these products. We are gratified that such a solution is now in place.”

I like the one that says the two companies have agreed to disagree.

By the way, these are not obscure things I tried to find. My search term? Simply: ”Microsoft statement”. I know Microsoft is a big company so I tried them to see what statements they give. These are just so thought out and so corporate – and there is room for companies to improve.

Here is a statement I would give:

“Microsoft and Novell have not been able to come to an agreement as to whether certain open source offerings infringe upon Microsoft patents and whether certain Microsoft offerings infringe upon Novell patents. Our additional agreement’s purpose is to put a workable solution in place for both company’s customers.”

I am not even sure if that is factually correct compared to the original statements, but I think it is somewhat close. Some tips for statements:

  • Try to use plain language (no complex words or terms, statements like “have agreed to disagree”, etc.).
  • Make the statements longer if it is necessary to make it easier to understand. Being too brief may confuse people.
  • Use enough pronouns to avoid sounding like a robot (i. e. Microsoft and Novell could say “we”), but don’t use too many.
  • Never accuse a customer. They may be dead wrong in the situation, but never accuse them. If you have to say something like “We understand the customer’s concerns and frustrations, but we do believe the customer’s story may be exaggerated.”
  • If you make a mistake, admit it.
  • Tell what happened that caused the mistake.
  • Tell what you did to fix the mistake.
  • Tell the readers what you are doing to prevent the mistake from happening.
  • Be honest.

Here is an example that I came up with for when a company missed something very obvious in a computer repair (based on something I read about):

“Company XYZ repairs thousands of computers per day. Due to our volume, we occasionally do miss a problem and sometimes do not find the best solution to the problem as quickly as we would like. In this situation, we dropped the ball and are not happy with ourselves for doing so. We have provided our sincere apologies to the concerned customer and are constantly working to further improve the quality level for the repairs we do at Company XYZ.”

The statement is honest, provides information that is actually useful, and does not use any weird lingo. Of course, the types of statement vary greatly from issue to issue and company to company.


Possibly Related Posts:

  1. Gratitude – A True Measure of Your Service Warmth “Thank you” are the two most important words in the...
  2. You’re Closer to Reward Travel Than You Think? I have two frequent flier accounts with Continental Airlines. One...

3 Responses to “Handling Customer Service Issues – Part 2 of 2”

  1. Client Service Insights (CSI) said:

    Jan 04, 07 at 8:20 am

    December Thanks!…

    At a client service blog, it’s only fitting to start the year by thanking those loyal CSI readers who were kind enough to leave a comment during the busy holiday season. I look forward to a great 2007 and wish you all…

  2. Etiquette » Blog Archive » Handling Customer Service Issues - Part 2 of 2 said:

    Jan 04, 07 at 8:33 am

    [...] Read more… Disengagement Ring. One Sunday, Bill relaxed on a … – January 4th, 2007Blog building etiquette – Part 1 – January 4th, 2007Waiter Etiquette – January 3rd, 2007New Year’s resolutions for 2006 – January 3rd, 2007E-mail Faux Pas – January 3rd, 2007 Sponsored Links Related Reading [...]

  3. Service Untitled » You can get better. - customer service and customer service experience blog said:

    Mar 08, 07 at 8:22 pm

    [...] The message seemed like a canned response from a PR department. In communication, executives should try to be sincere (which I think he is) and not pad messages with PR statements (which it seemed like). I’ve seen interviews and such with this particular executive and he doesn’t seem to talk like that naturally. Try to talk like you usually do. There are executives I talk to and when I see them write, I can easily tell it’s the same person. A person I work with likes to use the word “fantastic” when I’m talking to him and when he writes, it carries through. His emails, his blog posts, etc. are all very genuine and not all padded with PR speak.   [...]


Leave a Reply